群体性侵害事件的处理是当代社会的重要课题，中国三鹿奶粉事件的行政主导处理和日本Ｃ型肝炎诉讼案的立法与司法结合、合并和解各有千秋，都提供了重要的启示和经验, 本文通过对两案的比较，在分析其利弊的同时，指出其共同特点：在处理大规模群体性侵害事件时，积极开拓多元化处理机制、寻求善治，以对受害人的救济为核心，选择最有利于受害人获致救济的处理方式；政府责任的扩大及积极处理；基于特定体制、社会环境与条件的灵活处理。 [Abstract] How to deal with the groups tort incident is an important issue in contemporary society. In China, the Sanlu milk powder incident be settled by an executive-led way, and in Japan ,the hepatitis C litigation be settled by a new way of combined with legislation and justice, and group-settlement. Both of them have provided important inspiration and experience for this world. This paper Comparison of the two cases, the analysis of its pros and cons at the same time, pointing out that their common characteristics: deal with the groups tort incident by multi-ways and to seek good governance, to the remedy of victims at the core, select the ways most in favor of the victims’ remedy; the expansion of government responsibility; the flexibility based on the specific system, the social environment and conditions of a state. [Keywords] Sanlu milk powder incident; hepatitis C litigation of Japan ; class action ; groups tort incident; multi-ways

请见附件。