Why cannot civil society always live up to its advocates’ expectation? This study explores one possible explanation —the implication of different sources of inancing for operational autonomy from the state, business, and transnational organizations.Based on an analysis of data from the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, it shows that the pervasive myth of civil society self -sufficiency has no factual base. There is no country where private giving is the dominant source of revenue for civil society organizations. The study explains why this is the case,identifies actual patterns of civil society finance in the world, and discusses the possible implications of various funding patterns for civil society’s autonomy.

Money and Autonomy: Patterns of Civil Society Finance and Their Implications